Fashion Tv Midnight Hot Show Without Clothes Time

Stubbornness and Prudence: Excerpts from the Reflection Pastor Lisandro Orlov, Argentina




Friends, share

here an excerpt from a text written by the Lutheran Pastor Lisandro Orlov, who lives in Argentina, and I leave for reflection, as always.

GOSPEL Matthew 25: 1-13

Translation: The Book of the People of God. The Bible. Paoline. Madrid. Buenos Aires. 1990

At that time Jesus said to his disciples: The kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten youths who were with their lamps to meet the bridegroom. Five of them were foolish and five wise. The foolish took their lamps but no oil provided, while the wise took their lamps and oil filled their bottles. As the husband was expected, they all became drowsy and fell asleep. But at midnight there was a shout: 'Here comes the husband, out to meet him. " Then the girls woke up and trimmed their lamps. The foolish said unto the wise, 'Can you give us a little oil, for our lamps are gone? ". But these are answered, 'It will not reach for everyone. It is better to be buying the market '. Meanwhile, the bridegroom came, those who were ready went in with him in the bridal room and closed the door. Then came the other girls and said, 'Lord, Lord, open', but he replied: 'I tell you do not know. " Be forewarned, they know not the day nor the hour. The Gospel of the Lord.

We can not approach this text with naivete or simplicity. First I must express my difficulty in accepting a perspective deeply rooted in religious thought in any color and of all times facing the world in order to sort and separate. In the context of the epidemic of HIV and AIDS is extremely shocking I look at those people who have other criteria, other options and other customs from a strange sense of superiority incompatible with the Gospel. This way of understanding the world as if there were only two roads, two realities, classifying human beings into good and bad, puros e impuros, creyentes y ateos, ricos y pobres, del norte y del sur, blancos y negros, hombres y mujeres, heteros y homosexuales, fieles y promiscuos, usuarios y limpios. Este terrible dualismo ha sido la fuente de muchos estigmas y de todas las discriminaciones. Entonces tomemos la decisión de terminar en considerarnos a nosotros y nosotras como ciudadanos del cielo y todas y todos los demás, las y los diferentes, como perteneciendo a este mundo mientras nosotros nos ubicamos en una dimensión desconocida. Todos pertenecemos al mismo mundo amado por Aquel que todo ha creado a su imagen y semejanza. Todos y todas estamos convocados a ser parte del mismo espacio de liberación que llamamos Reino de Dios. Es necesario superar ahora y terminar aquí with the dualistic perspective in our understanding of our human relationships. Reality and our own lives are much more nuanced, color and brightness.

I have a dear friend who always says that good girls go to church and the bad ones go everywhere and every time you say goodbye to me and I behave if I do the invite. The text of the Gospel shows us that communion of situation in which our existence has placed us in a complex and diverse reality. Foolish and wise, foolish and wise share the same history and the same project, we all are part of one and the same space. This paper shows that both groups were asleep and no one is convicted for doing so. So this can not be the center and heart of the story, but it shows us something that Lutheran theology is saying for centuries but still seems not to have taken all the dimension it deserves in our thoughts and in our pastoral activity. We have always said that humans are "simul justus et peccator" to put it in theological formula, that is, always and still in the midst of our baptism and conversion live an ongoing, dynamic and constant tension and struggle in our ambiguous condition to be saved while sinners remain pure and impure while faithful and unstable in everything, good and bad, awake and asleep foolish and wise. This group of girls share that basic reality is shared not only between them but share it with us in that while we share with all people living with HIV or AIDS and with all of the stigmatized and excluded from the world . So I invite you to leave those looks suspiciously dualistic conditioning our relationship with humans and have a look a bit more positive and more realistic.

Stolen Out Of Gym Locker At School

Kristallnatch

"Toten ist eine Gestalt unseres wandernden Trauerns
Heitere Rest in Geist, an uns selber WAS
geschieht."
(Sonnet XI, Sonnets to Orpheus, Rainer Maria Rilke)

I do not feel German, although I am quoting Rilke in German, my grandfather has had Meyer's name, nor am I Jewish, but perhaps for that very reason is that as a Lutheran, I think Kristallnatch a historical episode as initiation as awful, as bad as the worst of nightmares.

It was the night of November 9, 1938 and both synagogues, and local and homes belonging to Jewish families were looted, broken the glass of your windows, hence the poetic name so horribly that night, and began the Jewish pogrom .

I keep asking myself what did the members of the Lutheran Church that night? Quiet sleep "maybe? What are the thoughts that went through the mind of Dietrich Bonnhoeffer subsequently hanged in a Nazi concentration camp just days before the war ended, to help escape from Jewish community members, while the Lutheran church "official" supported the Third Reich? What are the prayers sent to the Lord in these times? Would anyone not as a panic to try to prevent this disaster? What would we do instead, in place of those Lutherans, so atrocious witnessed political maneuver?

are suffering who have no name. That destroy the soul, writes the Mexican poet Roberto Arizmendi, "but the pain / shit! / Is something like / as disrupting life; / break any / everything off. "

Thousands of broken dreams. Thousands of lives lost. Torture carried out on purpose. There is no logic to it, no answer to such a loss, for a sore that humanity still bears. My brief remarks

just want to invite the thought, memory, memory. Because events like Kristallnatch , or the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, or any other movement that political power is running for their interests (and, by God, have also occurred in our country), sacrificing people whose humanity is as respectable as any other, with their flaws and virtues, and I quote one of my favorite quotes from Martin Luther's brother: "Simul et Peccator Iustus" - simply should not be neither accepted nor forgotten. Because events like this are why we have to work every day to make the world a better place for there to be peace and healthy living, so that, finally, the kingdom of God, a haven of peace and love , are realized on this earth. And I firmly believe that's our task, however difficult, despite the fear, despite everything. I think this is our calling.

Gown For Rent In Pasig

Reflections of a crazy boy


Well ... first time I write a blog ... Hello! I'm Patrick

Bornhardt, if you go to Martin Luther insurance congregation place me, at least from afar. Maybe I've seen also a gig with a beer in hand, or perhaps locate me as the king of gymnastics Germany, or perhaps just the most miserable have no idea who I am.

The truth is that in our society where time and again we lack the respect, the issue of dignity and justice arises constantly. Like we wrote Pamela stomach turns and we cry out loudly: soperutano such was not the slightest right to treat as well! .... But ... What's in it which he could not treat it worthy?

The Christian call to love invites us to this soperutano that haunts us, who hate us and makes us evil ... Platonic (or maybe Socrates) should feel more pity for this guy, this soperutano who committed an injustice that he suffered unjustly.
In the powerful words of the text you wrote does not escape anyone. Even the most innocent and disrespected seems to be cruelly criticized as inspired wrote, but I'm happy, because trying to sort out my ideas current terms expressed in terms that they St. Paul preached to the community. Those things that biblical missionary dared to say more bluntly to the Romans (Romans 3, 9-18), who had a judicial concept highly evolved and continue studying was the rights dictated to them today.

I hope you are not left only with the criticism which I will, but with the beautiful invitation to find the humility. The

document I have on my pc trial copy and paste this name:

ON DIGNITY AND RIGHTS

In the following paragraphs I write one of the many reflections that come to mind. A reflection that while searching the essence of what we mean by dignity and rights, intimate and very strong concepts. Try to express this thought in the most secular as possible, because even when these ideas, in my case, intimately tied to faith I know - from experience - that divine hear arguments in the case of an atheist or a misunderstanding is completely uncomfortable when inserted into a deep issue and I want everybody to participate in a dialogue with my words. More than anything this is a reflection questioning certain tax nuances of the basic concepts mentioned above, expresses my views and open more than one question.

This thought came into my head at the school last class of my life philosophy with Professor Lee after he sentenced as a moral rule that takes the item of human rights. Everything you write left with snapshots questions:

What are the rights? Do they exist? Is absolute truth? A protocol? Is it something we invented to play the righteous? Why free? Why push?

The sentence with which I began to argue with myself, and quickly shared with my good friend Martin Briceño intellectual, was: "I do not believe in rights. Do not exist. "But that statement stupid, my friend was quick to say that clearly existed. And of course there are, the practice of these is the irrefutable proof of the clear: there. It is the instinctive expression that we demand and claim what they deserve and deserve what we are doing or not doing, to receive or not receive! ... Deserve to be worthy ... ... Words of great significance they pose to my growing and Christian conscience very radical and different from what I perceive you think. This is where I start to spin the meaning of dignity. In practice you can see how this concept involves different and even opposite things depending on the position of each person. Perhaps an aristocrat feel worthy of being served and to be on the other, perhaps an African American feel worthy of being recognized by the racist, sexist perhaps feel worthy of being served by a woman, perhaps a consumer feel worthy of having a good TV or fashion shoes, perhaps the oppressed feel worthy to be on par with those who oppress them. And so many conditions that must be met to feel that our human condition is achieved. And oh! those who do not have that they deserve ... Be worthy ... ... Words Deserving so pretty, but with the potential to awaken in us as deadly pride! What if you do not have it you think at least for someone to be happy? Will you fight with your neighbor to get it? Are you going to envy those who estimates superior to death? Disparaging "who is worse than you, perhaps to try to feel better?

Based on these existential questions almost dare to define what we call dignity as we need or we meet or practice so that our life has meaning or is consistent with its purpose or according to how it should be lived. But why something so simple being different people different things as we think about it, if we all so alike! ... Did I just say that different people are equal? Why do I contradict myself? It seems that equality is a discussion on the collective consciousness of Western civilization it crazy not yet concluded. "We must be tolerant, because we are all different" "We are all people and are equally worthy" "You are unique. Each of us is unique, "" Respect the equality "are premises clichés is popularly accepted as true but at first glance seem quite opposite. Seek the roots of these ideas and extract the truth they contain. There are different races, different sexes and genders, different cultures. La verdad es que nuestras experiencias particulares, el ambiente en el que crecemos, las riquezas, las necesidades, aptitudes y falencias que nos son propias a lo largo de nuestra particular vida difícilmente coincidan con otra persona, aún en el caso de gemelos que comparten casi todo lo que mencioné anteriormente y son “genéticamente idénticos” se pueden observar diferencias abismales. Creo que acabo de concluir que cada uno de nosotros es simplemente único y distinto a cualquier otro.

La palabra Igualdad… está algo así como manoseada. La palabra Igualdad ha sido la inspiradora de incontables revoluciones y ha sido mástil de varias ideologías. ¡Tiene tanto poder, so hard! Is it just a desire born of resentment? I think not! "We are all people, no? But ... do not just say yes we are people, but different? What makes us individuals? In the first sentence of subparagraph dignity I defined as "what we need or must meet or practice so that our life has meaning or is consistent with its purpose or according to the way it should be lived.." I also mentioned in the preceding paragraph that the dignity that we had the need to meet certain conditions to feel like a human being itself, to be happy. An important point is not expressed in my definition. Perhaps the meaning of our life, its purpose, how we should live it lies in the human feeling, seize our humanity. Redefine dignity as "what we need or we feel meet or practice for humans and develop our humanity." I feel that this way of defining dignity is the key to extract the truth about equality.

After this point other than I came to the clear conclusion that the validity of this equality depends heavily on what it is that humans need to feel, what is this thing called dignity. Therefore it is something completely subjective, since, as exemplifying at first, the dignity means different things depending on our position. But if we are all humans should not be the same as to make us such? Is there an absolute truth and people are more and less successful? More and less happy? So unpopular that opinion, unfortunately - or thankfully - share it. We are all so blind! We see the truth so hard! Understanding this makes us happy so pure! What is this thing called dignity? What is human? What is happiness? For me there is only one answer that makes sense. This response is the basis of all my opinions, my ethics, and I also believe which is the basis of all philosophies that have been successful, and also the basis of everything that surrounds us. I hope you agree with me that the answer to these questions is love. Love is that what we call dignity, love is that which makes us human, and love is that which makes us happy. Love is that which becomes the final stone that will protect us from all evil, but we will encounter if we try to attach to other masts or if we believe that love is entirely foreign to the dignity and happiness. "We will stumble? Why? Just because we can not get rid of it. Love is within us, all of us. We made love and we are happy to feel it, to practice. First love to love each other, then loving ourselves and loving your neighbor then, when we realize that we all have the capacity to love. Herein lies the equality! We are all made of love, made for love, and hope that others realize! What good is holding on to this "dignity" which ends by denying the love in others, and to attack the love we feel for ourselves? Does not it feel the dignity of human specific and be happy? Therefore, I see no sense in what he despises the love of humans. Love is the only true and pure feel good.

BACK TO THE RIGHTS ...

"This trial is called for dignity and rights"? Almost forgot. Rights. The beginning of everything I wrote are questions about rights. On the first page exclamatory define this concept as "the instinctive expression that we demand and claim what they deserve and deserve what we are doing or not doing, to receive or not receive" ... Deserving be worthy ... ... These words again turn in my head full of feelings and different issues, sometimes opposite. Issues to consider a false but are printed in sound or letters of the word. In the previous paragraph I have made it clear that I think the realization of the dignity and happiness is the ability to love. How nice, but it sounds too boring. Where is the dynamic? Is the adventure? That sounds easy to be happy. Do not I have to struggle in life? I'm happy just because I have the ability to love. Sounds like conformity, but only because they have not discussed in all its aspects, but only in the abstract. Our life is almost infinite ways, and love as the basis of our life, comes in all different forms. Is multifaceted, very dynamic. But if it's so perfect, because we are all happy? Good question. All ethical crumbles when he is applied to a situation in which we are forced to violate one or the other way against the base of it, love. Here when one is desperate, he is blurry vision and triggers an unfortunate situation. I finish here exemplify the dignity relating to the rights, reaching the most contentious part of this essay, which are related concepts such as fairness, pride and freedom.

imagine a case where a person always ends up lashing out violently against their neighbors. Imagine that we are those who exercise authority. This violence directly affect the residents, in addition to disrupting end integrity, thus hindering the practice of love within them. We must stop this! We must ensure that the hard-charging understand the seriousness of this and stop it. But it is not easy, the hard-charging has reason to behave well, maybe you had mishaps that make it difficult to work towards the neighborhood. A few words will fail to change their attitude. Should we arrest him? "Deprive him of his freedom? What is fair? I just understand that everyone gets what they deserve and to receive and act on it is worthy. As I have concluded so far, dignity is that one needs to feel human, to be happy. The ability to love makes one human and happy, and develops a loving his humanity. For this reason we would just allow people to love. Nothing more. People just love deserves. If you captured the hard-charging will be violated, lacking respect for their humanity, taking away the freedom and perhaps causing more resentment that will make you love even harder next time. How unfair to him. How unfair even me being forced to create an injustice. But ... what about the neighbors who do not deserve to be violated? Do they deserve anything to be deprived of such violence? According to my findings above no. They already have what they deserve and have no right to take away the freedom to someone just because the assaults, when all you need to be happy is to love, and what better opportunity to love that you forgive someone who assaults. Perhaps the best way to soften his heart and hand in sight. That

radical. I say that people have no rights (except to love). I leave free the perpetrator and allow the residents continue to suffer. I have not solved any problem. Maybe the neighbors do not have enough patience and integrity will be destroyed, to stop the aggressor love and not understand the damage it causes. I'm a lousy politician. "But is not this what dictate our values? Does turning the other cheek? But is also the authority has been exercised and "Rights" have been issued in order that we enjoy? ... Rights ... First time I have left this word around in the course of this trial. What are the rights? Do they exist? Is absolute truth? A protocol? Is it something we invented to play the righteous? Why free? Why push? Are the questions that I became instantly to hear the professor of philosophy. More snapshots Quaker Oats do not need cooking.

So what are the rights?!

Although he admitted that there are rights, I have not admitted to be true, or if a protocol, if released, oppress or are just a game. I said we were through which we demand what we deserve, but I denied that we deserve something more than it already is inseparably ours (the ability to love), so there is nothing to enforce. Who said life was fair? We all have what we deserve. This view of freedom fills me and makes me feel completely uncommitted to the protocol that I am required by the "rights" dictates. A protocol that ensures that perform acts of love and that prevents the acts disrespectful, but through fear and obligation, unattached and these acts of love in its essence, being and not acts of love, but acts fearful. The sexual act must be done with complete freedom and joy, but the rights that we believe we must exercise and enforce only part of a game that tries to free pressing. A game powered by our fear, ambition and pride. A pride that comes from the idea that we deserve something more than it already has given us: life, the great and unique opportunity for us to love and be human and happy. This pride is inextricably linked to the ambition we begin to covet these things we are unique, triggering an overestimation that prevents us from seeing the neighbor with which we compete, thus putting blinders on that prevent us from seeing ourselves and love. This blindness fills us with fear, so we cling to idols or some "dignity" that fails to honor our humanity. For the same fear we submit to measures that promise security, order, food, and economic stability, but ends up forcing us to act against love, and lashing against ourselves and disoriented from our goal. We enslaved.

What radical! So many reviews! So many ups and obstacles! So we are human, it hurts the pride. But if you did not hit this pride by admitting our flaws, we will never get that humility that makes us see things that do make sense.

Full of gratitude, live the life, no suffering for my flaws, but taking advantage of those gifts that we have been given. Nobody calls me to do things right. Nobody punishes me for my shortcomings. Just know that I am extremely happy loving. Everything I have received and lived are gifts and see me as I accept them. I'm free. And I venture through life learning how to leverage with those around me these things do not deserve to have, but I have the freedom to enjoy and share. Rejoices every particle of my being to make express that love in me, and especially when it causes tenderness and release the other. Fear departs with confidence in this that makes me worthy to serve others when I feel like it and enjoy it because it makes it to the other and therefore to love is inside of him and me. Fear disappears with the hope that if I take this energy that gives me my life will meet its objective, with the result that will be recognized by that which unites us all, that makes us all equal: LOVE.

EPILOGUE

I hope my reflection, my statements and questions have caused you as an interesting dialogue. I hope that does not appear that he has tried to impose my views, because I think that one is free to think what he pleases, and only valid if something happens to oneself (or thinks he can think to yourself ... the truth is that everything I have said already that a saint or a philosopher ), but I am happy if their own conclusions were linked to love, that make you happy and free.

still remain convinced of the "peaceful authority" should one apply, I know that it would unleash a chaotic anarchism to be applied, so there are new questions as "what way to teach love?" "How to protect the oppressed? "" Is it okay for someone else happy impose order, even if unfairly? "but not imposed on those pages to answer this. Therefore I have chosen so far away with formalities and politics, praying that my particular action, personal and interfamilial cause this free service, this utopian order. At least until they discover how to apply it to our society.

amuses me so hard that I did not mention God (although all the text revolves around him) and he almost escaped me, more than once, a Hallelujah!

advise many who take the time to reflect on writing, speaking to someone else. Is very advantageous, one looks for words, so you have to work a lot more ideas. You can read what you wrote if you forget how it started, thus having a much more practical outlining.

I'm surprised that I have difficulty to symbolize things, transforming something theoretical to something practical and inspiring. I took to create this unique example, and written symbolic not only comparison I invented. Still, it's comforting to sort ideas.

I repeat that I wish you welcome this has been reading. I want material that will serve to draw their own conclusions about to related topics. Goodbye. That love of prosecution.

Patrick Bornhardt Daube

31/10/2008

INDEX

dignity ON THE Y Derecho ............... ................................ pg. 1-3

Introduction ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....................... pg. 1, paragraph 1,

definition of rights, dignity presentation ... .. ... ... .... P.. 1, 2 nd paragraph

Definition of dignity, presentation of the discussion in our collective consciousness about the equality
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ........ ........ pg. 1-2, 3rd paragraph

Seeking the truth of equality, dignity Redefining ... .. pg. 2, 4 th paragraph

Linking

love, dignity and equality ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... pg. 2-3, 5 th paragraph

GOING TO RIGHTS ... ............................... .............. pg. Returning

3-5 concepts, introduction to the relationship of concepts ... page. 3, 6 th paragraph

example, relating justice, dignity and rights ... ... ... ... .... P.. 3-4, 7 th paragraph

So what are the rights ?!................................ ................ pg. 4, 8 th paragraph

Conclusion ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. pg. 4-5, 9 th paragraph

EPILOGUE ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... pg. 6

CONTENTS ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... pg. 7

--------------------- That was ... bonding proved to be somewhat messy. Anything I write if they want to send the document.

Guten Tag, guten Abend und gute Nacht.

What Cereals Are Best On The Glycemic

protest, I refuse



I had the bad luck that a guy with whom he was going to taxi, I was mistreated, ie, insulted me, threatened me and hit me. I am surprised by the things I've heard from my account of it, such as "You should not drink on an equal footing with men, because men are disoriented and, as a woman, you have to do is stop them", or " you have a very aggressive feminist, why these things happen to you "or" does not report it because it is as much "or" you have something that brings out the twisted twisted me "or" because you pressed me, me did you get that backlash. "
And now at last this week decanting the horrendous episode is over, I answer every one of those things and refer others think also.
First, I refuse to believe that when a person assaults another, there is some logical reason for it. It was not my speech, not what or how much you drink cart with a man and I do not think you have to act as the mother of each subject that I know and always keep a certain control position so he would not be disbanded (will not be assumes that all human beings develop self-control and we take responsibility for what we do, regardless of gender or sexual identity that we possess? Let me apologize for those who see it otherwise. But I flatly refuse to accept as anything but a response "Yes, be responsible and self-control is what we all have to do ").
The issue is this: a violent man is a violent man, no matter what you say or what you do, or what you think, this violent man will always find the way to attack you and make you feel that you are responsible for it, despite that, in good Chilean aggression is his story. It amazes me how people unconsciously empathize with that position, which says in part, I am responsible for having had a penknife in the neck or offend me in ways I do not want to bring up now (in fact, the idea is to forget) . Thousands of times I reel with other men, thousands of times, I have spoken the same things ... why are supposed to have to assume some responsibility for the violent behavior of another, when there is no reason for it?
A decent man, a good man (which I also know these and many), not responding to pressure, if there was such pressure, with insults, but is explained or, finally, leaves the place where you feel uncomfortable rather than punish another for what is bothering you. And that's the point. I refuse to believe in any way that a person who is being abused physically and / or psychologically (read: male or female) should think that has to change aspects of his personality, his speech, his way of being to life. No, no way. What you need do is to root out the violent relationship with someone so it does not consume you in a spiral dysfunctional. And if you're violent, there other things you have to change, beginning with taking responsibility and walk straight into a good therapy. The rest do not have to pay what you put inside you wrong. And not the other, is not out why. You who wants to hit, insult, abuse and look for any opportunity to do so stupid.
If, as a society, we perpetuate the idea that "when you are stuck for a reason", we justify the position of the aggressor, we are sitting comfortably, watching passes over the rights of children people with different sexual identities, ethnic groups, women, and why not, men are also victims of women who minimized, abuse and assault. And I absolutely refuse to be validated violence, to those who suffer every day are put into question, instead of being supported and welcomed, understood the tremendous pain they suffer. Basta. Let's see the speck in your neighbor's eye, rather than see the beam in our own. As a society and, often, as people, we are unable to contain and support the sufferer. And here I go again: I refuse, I refuse to accept these situations and adapt to them as if they were right. And not only refuse me, I am outraged and I rebel with the only weapon that I can wield: words.